Vol. 13 No. 1 (2022): The Bibliographic Control in the Digital Ecosystem

Wikidata: a new perspective towards universal bibliographic control

Carlo Bianchini
University of Pavia, Department of Musicology and Cultural Heritage (Cremona)
Lucia Sardo
University of Bologna, Ravenna Campus

Published 2022-01-13


  • UBC,
  • Universal Bibliographic Control,
  • Wikidata,
  • Metadata,
  • Description,
  • Identification
  • ...More

How to Cite

Bianchini, C., & Sardo, L. (2022). Wikidata: a new perspective towards universal bibliographic control. JLIS.It, 13(1), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12725


Traditional UBC provides for the standardization of bibliographic records, the creation of guidelines dedicated to national bibliographic agencies, the creation of the UNIMARC format, and the curation of authority data. Bibliographic Control has deeply evolved since IFLA theorization during the Seventies of the XX Century, due to the availability of a very large range of new bibliographic tools. At the beginning of the XXI century, UBC is quite different and involves new actors. Among these, Wikidata has a background greatly different from that of libraries as institutions: it is not devoted to bibliographic data, nor it is limited to personal authority control, but its value in AC tools like VIAF and National Libraries authority files is undiscussed. After a presentation on how Wikidata items describe and identify bibliographic entities, the authors underline how the existence, use and reuse of Wikidata affect the way the professional community thinks about UBC. Wikidata is a clear example of the need for a new approach to identification and description, that are deeply intertwined. Secondly, from a Wikidata perspective, the relevance of globally preferred and variant access points is lessened. Moreover, descriptions in Wikidata – although conceptually very similar to the traditional one – present differences and potentialities that a traditional description does not have and cannot have. Also from a theoretical perspective, Wikidata offers a pragmatic way to think globally and act locally. In fact, it shows that there is no need for one standardization of practices for establishing the headings and structure of authority records in one international form; instead, users’ convenience can be achieved by a technological infrastructure capable to present to each user the information about an entity in its own language and script. Additionally, Wikidata is the most evident example of the distributed and diffused approach of the semantic web to the issue of the universal identification of the entities. Also, Wikidata identification and description show that authority and bibliographic control must be tackled as just a part of the more general topic of the creation of a knowledge graph of all human knowledge by means of linked open data. Lastly, this objective cannot be achieved only by contribution, cooperation, and networking of large national agencies (as in VIAF), as a larger number of stakeholders must be involved to achieve a UBC also including the full indexing of any kind of scientific communication


Metrics Loading ...


  1. Agenjo-Bullón, Xavier, and Francisca Hernández-Carrascal. 2020. ‘Wikipedia, Wikidata y Mix’n’match’. Anuario ThinkEPI 14. https://doi.org/10/ghbj6t.
  2. Allison-Cassin, Stacy, and Dan Scott. 2018. ‘Wikidata: A Platform for Your Library’s Linked Open Data’. Code4Lib Journal, 4 May 2018. https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/13424.
  3. Anderson, Dorothy. 1974. Universal Bibliographic Control. A Long Term Policy - A Plan for Action. Munchen: Verlag Dokumentation.
  4. Association of Research Libraries. 2019. ARL White Paper on Wikidata. Opportunities and Recommendations.
  5. Balaraman, Vevake, Simon Razniewski, and Werner Nutt. 2018. ‘Recoin: Relative Completeness in Wikidata’. In WWW ’18 Companion: The 2018 WebConference Companion, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, France. New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191641.
  6. Bargioni, Stefano, Carlo Bianchini, and Camillo Pellizzari. 2021. ‘Beyond VIAF. Wikidata as a Complementary Tool for Authority Control in Libraries’. Information Technology and Libraries 40 (2). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v40i2.12959
  7. Berners-Lee, Tim. 2006. ‘Linked Data - Design Issues’. 27-7-2006. 2006. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.
  8. Cobb, Simon. 2019. ‘Connecting Persistent Identifiers in Wikidata’. In Portland PID Workshop, 6th May 2019. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Connecting_persistent_iden- tifiers_in_Wikidata.pdf.
  9. ———. 2020. ‘Author items in Wikidata’. Presented at the WikiCiteVirtual Conference, October 26. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cc/WikiCite_Virtual_Confer- ence_2020_-_Author_items_in_Wikidata_-_Slides.pdf.
  10. Dunsire, Gordon, and Mirna Willer. 2014. ‘The Local in the Global: Universal Bibliographic Control from the Bottom Up’. In IFLA WLIC 2014. Lyon, France. http://library.ifla.org/817/.
  11. Godby, Jean, Karen Smith-Yoshimura, Bruce Washburn, Kalan Knudson Davis, Karen Detling, Christine Fernsebner Eslao, Steven Folsom, et al. 2020. ‘Creating Library Linked Data with Wikibase: Lessons Learned from Project Passage’. OCLC. 4 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.25333/ faq3-ax08.
  12. Gorman, Michael. 2014. ‘The Origins and Making of the ISBD: A Personal History, 1966–1978’. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52 (8): 821–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.929604.
  13. Hernández-Cazorla, Iván, Manuel Ramírez-Sánchez, and Gregorio Rodríguez-Herrera. 2019. ‘Wikidata, WikiCite y Scholia Como Herramientas Para Un Corpus de Datos Bibliográficos Enlazados. Curación y Estructuración de La Producción Científica de Los Investigadores Del IATEXT’. PRISMA.COM 40 (2019): 78–87.
  14. IFLA Cataloguing Section and IFLA Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code. 2016. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP). Den Haag: IFLA.
  15. Illien, Gildas, and Françoise Bourdon. 2014. ‘A la recherche du temps perdu, retour vers le futur: CBU 2.0’. In IFLA WLIC 2014. Lyon, France. http://library.ifla.org/956/.
  16. Lemus-Rojas, Mairelys, and Jere D. Odell. 2018. ‘Creating Structured Linked Data to Generate Scholarly Profiles: A Pilot Project Using Wikidata and Scholia’. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 6. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2272.
  17. Linked Data for Production. 2020. ‘Wikidata as a hub for identifiers’. Google Docs. 11 June 2020.
  18. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jWz3_nCf5rdd-7ejETGlfv99UV2PnD1v/edit?usp=em- bed_facebook.
  19. Mietchen, Daniel, and Lane Rasberry. 2020. ‘Presenting Scholia. A Scholarly Profiling Tool’. Presented at the LD4 Wikidata Affinity Group, August 11. https://docs.google.com/presenta- tion/d/1jJbYSnYSDh36-LxzSpedFyWUzusZAjuBbP-y46ji-0w/edit#slide=id.g35f391192_00.
  20. Nguyen, Ba Xuan, Jesse David Dinneen, and Markus Luczak-Roesch. 2020. ‘A Novel Method for Resolving and Completing Authors’ Country Affiliation Data in Bibliographic Records’. Journal of Data and Information Science 5 (3): 97–115. https://doi.org/10/ghsnkn.
  21. Nielsen, Finn Årup, Daniel Mietchen, and Egon Willighagen. 2017. ‘Scholia, Scientometrics and Wikidata’. In The Semantic Web: ESWC 2017 Satellite Events, edited by Eva Blomqvist, Katja Hose, Heiko Paulheim, Agnieszka Ławrynowicz, Fabio Ciravegna, and Olaf Hartig, 10577:237– 59. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-70407-4_36.
  22. Seidlmayer, Eva, Jakob Voß, Tetyana Melnychuk, Lukas Galke, Klaus Tochtermann, Carsten Schultz, and Konrad Forstner. 2020. ‘ORCID for Wikidata – Data Enrichment for Scientometric Applications’. In Proceedings of The 1st Wikidata Workshop. https://wikidataworkshop.github.io/ papers/Wikidata_Workshop_2020_paper_9.pdf.
  23. Smith, Arthur P. 2020. ‘Author Disambiguation’. In WikiCite 2020 Virtual conference. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/38/WikiCite_2020_Author_items.webm.
  24. Unesco/LC Bibliographical Survey. 1950. Bibliographical Services: Their Present State and Possibilities of Improvement. Washington: Library of Congress.
  25. Veen, Theo van. 2019. ‘Wikidata: From “an” Identifier to “the” Identifier’. Information Technology and Libraries (Online) 38 (2): 72–81. https://doi.org/10/ghbj62.
  26. Vrandečić, Denny, and Markus Krötzsch. 2014. ‘Wikidata: A Free Collaborative Knowledgebase’. Communications of the ACM 57 (10): 78–85. https://doi.org/10/gftnsk.
  27. W3C Incubator Group. 2011. ‘Library Linked Data Incubator Group Final Report’. http://www. w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/XGR-lld-20111025/.