Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023)

Books in a bubble.: Assessing the OAPEN Library collection

Ronald Snijder
OAPEN Foundation

Published 2023-05-15


  • Open access,
  • OAPEN Library,
  • Library assessment,
  • Books ,
  • Book impact

How to Cite

Snijder, R. (2023). Books in a bubble.: Assessing the OAPEN Library collection. JLIS.It, 14(2), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-498


Open access infrastructure for books is becoming more mature, and it is being used by an increasing number of people. The growing importance of open access infrastructure leads to more interest in sustainability, governance and impact assessment. The assessment of the OAPEN Library – containing over 20,000 titles – fits within this trend. How well does the collections meets the needs of its stakeholders: readers, libraries, funders and publishers?

The composition of the collection is measured using subject and language. Both dissemination and the content-related aspects are paired to the number of publications. The average number of downloads per title is relatively similar for all subjects. However, the mean downloads of titles in English is roughly twice as much compared to German and the other languages. Combining subjects and languages shows that the dissemination of books in languages other than English is less predictable. This assessment has illustrated the composition of the collection and how its readers make use of it. The visualisation helped to tell a complicated story in a simple way; a powerful instrument to guide the further development of this open access infrastructure.


Metrics Loading ...


  1. Bilder, Geoffrey, Jennifer Lin, and Cameron Neylon. 2020. ‘The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure’. https://doi.org/10.24343/C34W2H.
  2. Book Industry Communication. 2010. ‘BIC Standard Subject Categories – an Overview’. 2010. http://www.bic.org.uk/7/BIC-Standard-Subject-Categories/.
  3. Borin, Jacqueline, and Hua Yi. 2008. ‘Indicators for Collection Evaluation: A New Dimensional Framework’. Collection Building 27 (4): 136–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/01604950810913698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01604950810913698
  4. Borin, Jacqueline, and Hua Yi. 2011. ‘Assessing an Academic Library Collection through Capacity and Usage Indicators: Testing a Multi‐dimensional Model’. Collection Building 30 (3): 120–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/01604951111146956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01604951111146956
  5. Brookes-Kenworthy, Chloe, Richard Hosking, Chun-Kai (Karl) Huang, Lucy Montgomery, Cameron Neylon, Alkim Ozaygen, and Katie Wilson. 2019. ‘“Is the Library Open?”: Correlating Unaffiliated Access to Academic Libraries with Open Access Support’, September. https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:26879/.
  6. Chen, Hsuanwei Michelle. 2017. ‘Chapter 4. Real-World Uses for Information Visualization in Libraries’. Library Technology Reports 53 (3): 21–25. https://www.journals.ala.org/index.php/ltr/article/view/6291.
  7. DOAB. 2021. ‘DOAB Trusted Platform Network’. 2021. https://www.doabooks.org/en/publishers/doab-trusted-platform-network.
  8. Finch, Jannette L., and Angela R. Flenner. 2016. ‘Using Data Visualization to Examine an Academic Library Collection’. College & Research Libraries 77 (6): 765–78. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.6.765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.6.765
  9. Folb, Barbara L., Charles B. Wessel, and Leslie J. Czechowski. 2011. ‘Clinical and Academic Use of Electronic and Print Books: The Health Sciences Library System e-Book Study at the University of Pittsburgh.’ Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 99 (3): 218–28. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.009
  10. Giménez Toledo, Elea, Emanuel Kulczycki, Janne Pölönen, and Gunnar Sivertsen. 2019. ‘Bibliodiversity-What It Is and Why It Is Essential to Creating Situated Knowledge’. Impact of Social Sciences Blog. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/103440/1/impactofsocialsciences_2019_12_05_bibliodiversity_what_it_is_and_why.pdf.
  11. Hyödynmaa, Merja, Aniita Ahlholm‐Kannisto, and Hannele Nurminen. 2010. ‘How to Evaluate Library Collections: A Case Study of Collection Mapping’. Collection Building 29 (2): 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/01604951011040125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01604951011040125
  12. IRUS-UK. 2018. ‘International Collaboration and Value: Working with OAPEN’. IRUS-UK Case Studies. https://irus.jisc.ac.uk/documents/IRUS-UK_working_with_OAPEN.pdf.
  13. Kelly, Madeline. 2014. ‘Applying the Tiers of Assessment: A Holistic and Systematic Approach to Assessing Library Collections’. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 40 (6): 585–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.10.002
  14. Lamothe, Alain. 2010. ‘Electronic Book Usage Patterns as Observed at an Academic Library: Searches and Viewings’. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 5 (1): 1–16. http://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/viewArticle/1071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v5i1.1071
  15. Lantzy, Tricia, Talitha Matlin, and Judy Opdahl. 2020. ‘Creating a Library-Wide Collection Management Cycle: One Academic Library’s Approach to Continuous Collection Assessment’. Journal of Library Administration 60 (2): 155–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1677092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1677092
  16. Ogg, Lesley. 2010. ‘Launch of the OAPEN Library at the Frankfurt Book Fair’. 20 September 2010. https://blog.alpsp.org/2010/09/launch-of-oapen-library-at-frankfurt.html.
  17. Perrin, Joy M., Le Yang, Shelley Barba, and Heidi Winkler. 2017. ‘All That Glitters Isn’t Gold: The Complexities of Use Statistics as an Assessment Tool for Digital Libraries’. The Electronic Library 35 (1): 185–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-09-2015-0179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-09-2015-0179
  18. Snijder, Ronald. 2022. ‘Big in Japan, Zimbabwe or Brazil – Global Reach and National Preferences for Open Access Books’. Insights 35 (June): 11. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.580
  19. Stregger, Elizabeth, and Jaclyn McLean. 2021. ‘Location-Based Trickery: Librarian Efforts to Provide Access to Unaffiliated Users’. Weave: Journal of Library User Experience 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.3998/weaveux.222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/weaveux.222
  20. Whitford, Leslie. 2014. ‘DOAB: Directory of Open Access Books’. Reference Reviews 28 (3): 12–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/RR-10-2013-0269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RR-10-2013-0269