Vol. 15 No. 3 (2024): Profili di donne fra carte e libri / Profiles of women among documents and books
Articles

Women in the Metaverse and the gender data gap: a cultural approach

Italian PDF
  • Rossana Morriello
Rossana Morriello
University of Florence
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-623

Published 2024-09-15

Keywords

  • Gender data gap,
  • Gender digital divide,
  • Artificial intelligence,
  • Data librarianship.

How to Cite

Morriello, Rossana. 2024. “Women in the Metaverse and the Gender Data Gap: A Cultural Approach”. JLIS.It 15 (3):81-97. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-623.

Copyright (c) 2024 Rossana Morriello

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The metaverse is an immersive and interconnected technological environment that we are already a part of. We live in a "meta" environment compared to reality, in which the digital world and the analog world continuously intersect in an uninterrupted flow. We are surrounded in our daily lives by digital connections and objects that connect with each other and with the real world, from which they draw data. In the metaverse, whether understood in this broad sense or in a narrow sense, social structures and gender biases are reproduced, with all the elements of intersectionality present in reality, deeply rooted in the socio-cultural context and represented in the data used by algorithmic models. The predominance of men in the fields of study and work in information and communication technologies, where algorithmic models are developed, does not facilitate the overcoming of these problems. The data underlying artificial intelligence and the metaverse reflect the gender biases present in work, education, scientific research, journalism, and many other sectors. However, digital technology, artificial intelligence, and the metaverse can offer opportunities to overcome the gender gap.

Italian PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Alaghband, Mina, e Lareina Yee. 2022. “Even in the metaverse, women remain locked out of leadership roles.” McKinsey & Company Insights, 21 novembre 2022. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/even-in-the-metaverse-women-remain-locked-out-of leadership-roles.
  2. Baggio, Giovannella, Alberto Corsini, Annarosa Floreani, Sandro Giannini, e Vittorina Zagonel. 2013. “Gender medicine: a task for the third millennium.” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 51 (4): 713-727. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2012-0849
  3. Ball, Matthew. 2022. Metaverso. Cosa significa, chi lo controllerà e perché sta rivoluzionando le nostre vite. Milano: Garzanti.
  4. Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Boyd, Karen S. 2012. “Glass Ceiling.” In Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Society, 549-552. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 30 gennaio 2012. https://edge.sagepub.com/system/files/15_GlassCeiling.pdf.
  6. Buolamwini, Joy, e Timnit Gebru. 2018. “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification.” In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 81: 1–15. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a/buolamwini18a.pdf.
  7. Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241-1299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  8. Criado Perez, Caroline. 2020. Invisibili. Come il nostro mondo ignora le donne in ogni campo. Dati alla mano. Torino: Einaudi.
  9. De Martin, Juan Carlos. 2023. Contro lo smartphone. Per una tecnologia più democratica. Prefazione di Gustavo Zagrebelsky. Torino: Add.
  10. Di Biase, Antonella. 2024. “No, per salvarsi da una violenza sessuale nel metaverso non “basta staccare il visore.”” The Vision, 6 febbraio 2024. https://thevision.com/attualita/violenza-donne-metaverso/.
  11. D’Ignazio, Catherine, e Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. The Economist Group. 2024. Iceland is the best place to be a working woman for the second year according to The Economist’s 2024 glass-ceiling index, 7 marzo 2024. https://www.economistgroup.com/group-news/the-economist/iceland-is-the-best-place-to-be-a-working-woman-for-the-second-year.
  13. European Commission. 2020a. A Union of Equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0152.
  14. European Commission. 2020b. Gender equality in research and innovation. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/democracy-and-rights/gender-equality-research-and-innovation_en#gender-equality-in-horizon-europe.
  15. European Commission. 2021. Mapping the glass ceiling: The EU regions where women thrive and where they are held back, 21 ottobre 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/information-sources/maps/gender-equality-monitor_en.
  16. EIGE (European Institute for Gender Equality). 2022. Gender Equality Index. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2023/IT.
  17. Floridi, Luciano. 2015. The Onlife Manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319040936.
  18. Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
  19. Gage, Matilda Joslyn. 1883. “Woman as an Inventor.” The North American Review 136 (318): 478-489. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25118273.
  20. Gouges, Olympe de. 2023. Dichiarazione dei diritti della donna e della cittadina. Verona: Oligo.
  21. Greshko, Michael. 2019. “Il celebre guerriero vichingo era in realtà una donna?.” National Geographic Italia, 29 novembre 2019. https://www.nationalgeographic.it/storia-e-civilta/2019/11/secondo-il-dna-il-famoso-guerriero-vichingo-era-una-donna.
  22. Howard, Heather A., Meara H. Habashi, e Jason B. Reed. 2020. “The Gender Wage Gap in Research Libraries.” College & Research Libraries 81 (4): 662-675. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.4.662. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.4.662
  23. Hughes, Virginia. 2013. “Were the First Artists Mostly Women?.” National Geographic, 10 ottobre 2013. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/article/131008-women-handprints-oldest-neolithic-cave-art#.
  24. IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2020. Libraries delivering gender equality. https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/faife/publications/libraries_delivering_gender_equality_how_libraries_feature_in_national_reports_on_the_beijing_declaration.pdf.
  25. ISTAT (Istituto nazionale di statistica). 2023. Stereotipi di genere e immagine sociale della violenza. Primi risultati. Roma: ISTAT. https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/291163.
  26. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). 2023. The gender digital divide. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2023/10/10/ff23-the-gender-digital-divide.
  27. Maatta, Stephanie. 2008. “Inside the library gender gap.” Library Journal, 10 ottobre 2008. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/inside-the-library-gender-gap.
  28. Martorana, Marco, e Zakaria Sichi. 2022. “Il Metaverso e il reato di molestie sessuali nella realtà virtuale.” Altalex, 23 febbraio 2022. https://www.altalex.com/documents/news/2022/02/23/il-metaverso-e-il-reato-di-molestie-sessuali-nella-realta-virtuale.
  29. Mauro, Gianluca, e Hilke Schellmann. 2023. “There is no standard’: investigation finds AI algorithms objectify women’s bodies.” The Guardian, 8 febbraio 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/08/biased-ai-algorithms-racy-women-bodies.
  30. Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.” Science 159 (3810). 10.1126/science.159.3810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
  31. The Metaverse Standards Forum. 2022. https://metaverse-standards.org/.
  32. Midili, Lorenzo. 2024. “Un caso di aggressione sessuale nel metaverso solleva interrogativi sul futuro dei processi legali per crimini virtuali.” Diritto di Internet. Intelligenza artificiale, Digital Copyright and Data Protection, 8 gennaio 2024. https://dirittodiinternet.it/un-caso-di-aggressione-sessuale-nel-metaverso-solleva-interrogativi-sul-futuro-dei-processi-legali-per-crimini-virtuali/.
  33. Moreno, Carlos. 2024. La città dei 15 minuti. Per una cultura urbana democratica. Torino: Add.
  34. Morriello, Rossana. 2022. Dalla pirateria dei libri all’editoria predatoria. Un percorso tra storia della stampa ed etica della comunicazione scientifica. Milano: Ledizioni. https://zenodo.org/record/7614728.
  35. Morriello, Rossana. 2023. “Dati e metadati bibliotecari per l’intelligenza artificiale: per un’agency delle biblioteche.” Biblioteche oggi Trends 9 (1): 38-45. 10.3302/2421-3810-202301-038-1.
  36. Morriello, Rossana, e Lucia Sardo. 2023. “Biblioteconomia e decolonialità: collezioni e cataloghi per una visione altra.” In Visioni future. Next Generation Library. Relazioni Convegno 2023. 30 marzo 2023, 165-174. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.
  37. Pintarelli, Flavio. 2020. “The library inside Minecraft and our future in the Metaverse.” Domus, 17 marzo 2020. https://www.domusweb.it/en/news/gallery/2020/03/16/the-library-inside-minecraft-and-our-future-in-the-metaverse.html.
  38. Roncaglia, Gino. 2023. L’architetto e l’oracolo. Forme digitali del sapere da Wikipedia a ChatGPT. Roma: Laterza.
  39. Roncaglia, Gino. 2024. “Due esempi di intelligenze artificiali bibliotecarie.” In Le biblioteche nella fantascienza. Utopie, distopie, intelligenze artificiali, a cura di Rossana Morriello, Gino Roncaglia, e Federico Meschini, 111-131. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.
  40. Rossiter, Margaret W. 1993. “The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.” Social Studies in Science 23: 325-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004
  41. UNICEF (United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund). 2023. “Digital divide di genere: è offline il 90% delle ragazze adolescenti nei Paesi a basso reddito.” https://www.unicef.it/media/digital-divide-di-genere-e-offline-il-90-delle-ragazze-adolescenti-nei-paesi-a-basso-reddito/.
  42. United Nations. 1995. “Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action https://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/pdf/BDPfA%20E.pdf. Traduzione italiana sul sito del Ministero dell’Interno https://www1.interno.gov.it/mininterno/export/sites/default/it/assets/files/17/0821_Dichiarazione_di_Pechino.pdf.
  43. UN Women. 2023. Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot 2023. https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/progress-on-the-sustainable-development-goals-the-gender-snapshot-2023-en.pdf.
  44. UN Women. 2024. Artificial intelligence and gender equality. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/explainer/2024/05/artificial-intelligence-and-gender-equality.
  45. WACC (World Association for Christian Communication). 2020. 6th Global Media Monitoring Project. Highlight of Findings. https://whomakesthenews.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GMMP-2020.Highlights_FINAL.pdf.
  46. Williams, Christine L. 1992. “The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the ‘Female’ Professions.” Social Problems 39 (3): 253-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3096961