Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026): What does the future hold for shared cataloguing in Italy and for SBN? A proactive contribution / Quale futuro per la catalogazione condivisa in Italia e per SBN? Un contributo propositivo
Articles

Digital legal deposit: cooperation, preservation, and new access opportunities

Italian PDF
  • Giovanni Bergamin,
  • Maurizio Messina
Giovanni Bergamin
Formerly National Central Library of Florence
Maurizio Messina
Formerly Marciana National Library
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-697

Published 2026-01-15

Keywords

  • Digital Legal Deposit Collection,
  • Cybersecurity,
  • Automated library metadata creation,
  • Computational access,
  • Text and Data Mining (TDM),
  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Bergamin, Giovanni, and Maurizio Messina. 2026. “Digital Legal Deposit: Cooperation, Preservation, and New Access Opportunities”. JLIS.It 17 (1):38-60. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-697.

Copyright (c) 2026 Giovanni Bergamin, Maurizio Messina

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This paper examines the profound transformation of library collections in the digital era and the pivotal role of legal deposit. In Italy, the incomplete legal framework for digital resource deposit has resulted in the loss of two decades of cultural production. Legal deposit remains the primary mechanism for building a national cultural heritage collection, a concept widely embraced. International cooperation models are examined, such as the UK’s collaborative system, which mitigated the impact of a severe cyberattack on the British Library in 2023. The study underscores the need for robust cybersecurity and considers decentralized storage solutions like private IPFS networks. New AI-driven tools for cataloguing and metadata creation, such as Annif, and innovative access methods are analyzed. Italian law now permits Text and Data Mining (TDM) on legal deposit collections for scientific research. A Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) model is proposed for computational access, ensuring transparency by linking results to source documents. The paper advocates for a new cooperative governance model, potentially supported by a publicly owned in-house company, to deliver advanced and sustained technological services to legal deposit institutions, ensuring effective management of digital legal deposit systems and aligning with libraries’ evolving roles in cultural and social ecosystems.

Italian PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. AIB (Associazione italiana biblioteche, Gruppo di lavoro sulle biblioteche digitali). 2023. Piano d’azione per l’infrastruttura nazionale della conoscenza. Roma: Associazione italiana biblioteche.
  2. Bergamin, Giovanni, e Lorenzo Gobbo. 2025. “IPFS for the long term digital preservation”. (In corso di pubblicazione).
  3. Bergamin, Giovanni, e Anna Lucarelli. 2012. “The Nuovo Soggettario as a service for the linked data world.” JLIS.it 4 (1): 213. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-5474.
  4. Breeding, Marshall, “2025 library systems report,” American libraries, 1 maggio 2025, https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2025/05/01/2025-library-systems-report/.
  5. Broussard, Meredith. 2019. La non intelligenza artificiale: come i computer non capiscono il mondo. Milano: Angeli.
  6. Chae, Youngjin, e Thomas Davidson. 2025. “Large language models for text classification: from zero-shot learning to instruction-tuning.” Sociological methods & research https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251325243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241251325243
  7. Cheti, Alberto. 2025. “L’accesso per soggetto: dal catalogo a schede al catalogo online, con uno sguardo all’Intelligenza Artificiale.” AIB Studi, 64 (3): 321–52. https://doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-14127.
  8. Chilovi, Desiderio. 1903. L’archivio della letteratura italiana e la Biblioteca nazionale centrale di Firenze. Firenze: Bemporad (testo reperibile anche in https://www.aib.it/aib/stor/testi/chilovi3.htm).
  9. Comitato dei Ministri agli Stati membri sulla legislazione e la politica delle biblioteche in Europa. 2023. Raccomandazione del Comitato dei Ministri agli Stati membri sulla legislazione e la politica delle biblioteche in Europa. https://eblida.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Traduzione_EBLIDA_Raccomandazioni_Consiglio_d_Europa.pdf.
  10. Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, e Timothy J. Dickey. 2010. Towards a profile of the researcher of today: What can we learn from JISC projects? Common themes Identified in an analysis of JISC Virtual Environment and Digital Repository Projects. https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/418/2/VirtualScholar_themesFromProjects_revised.pdf.
  11. Di Marcantonio, Giorgia. 2025. “Intelligenza artificiale, Large Language Models (LLMs) e Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Nuovi strumenti per l’accesso alle risorse archivistiche e bibliografiche.” Bibliothecae.it 13 (1): 161-73.
  12. DNB (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek). 2017. General outline and introduction of the future subject cataloguing procedure for publications at the German National Library. https://www.dnb.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Professionell/Erschliessen/konzeptWeiterentwicklungInhaltserschliessungMai2017.html.
  13. DPC (Digital Preservation Coalition). 2022. Computational Access: A beginner's guide for digital preservation practitioners. http://doi.org/10.7207/compaccess22-01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7207/compaccess22-01
  14. Fan, Wenqi , Yujuan Ding, Liangbo Ning, Shijie Wang, Hengyun Li, Dawei Yin, Tat-Seng Chua, e Qing Li. 2024. “A Survey on RAG meeting LLMs: towards retrieval-augmented Large Language Models.” In KDD '24: Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 6491-501. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671470
  15. Farrell, Henry, Alison Gopnik, Cosma Shalizi, e James Evans. 2025. “Large AI models are cultural and social technologies.” Science 387(6739), 1153-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adt9819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adt9819
  16. Gao, Yunfan, Yun Xiong, Xinyu Gao, Kangxiang Jia, Jinliu Pan, Yuxi Bi, Yi Dai, Jiawei Sun, e Haofen Wang. “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey.” Preprint, sottomesso il 27 marzo 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.10997.
  17. Golub, Koraljka, Osma Suominen, Ahmed Taiye Mohammed, Harriet Aagaard, e Olof Osterman. 2024. , “Automated Dewey Decimal Classification of Swedish library metadata using Annif software.” Journal of Documentation 80 (5): 1057-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2022-0026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2022-0026
  18. Gömpel, Renate, Ulrike Junger, e Elisabeth Niggemann. 2010, “Veränderungen im Erschließungskonzept der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek.” Dialog mit Bibliotheken 22 (1): 20–2 https://d-nb.info/1009804510/34.
  19. Guerrini, Mauro. 2021. “Il controllo bibliografico nell’era digitale: identificatori, metadati, punti d’accesso e rispetto del contesto culturale e linguistico.” Biblioteche oggi trends 7 (1). https://www.doi.org/10.3302/2421-3810-202101-092-1.
  20. Humphreys, Kenneth William. 1964. “The role of the national Library: a preliminary statement.” Libri 14: 356-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1964.14.2.126
  21. IFLA FAIFE (Committee on Freedom of Access to Information and Freedom of Expression). 2020. IFLA statement on libraries and artificial intelligence. https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/1646.
  22. Lewis, Patrick, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, e Douwe Kiela, 2020. “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Paper.pdf.
  23. Kempf, Klaus. 2013. Der Sammlungsgedange im Digitalen Zeitalter - L'idea della collezione nell'età digitale. Fiesole: Casalini libri.
  24. Kluge, Lisa, e Maximilian Kähler. “DNB-AI-Project at SemEval-2025 Task 5: An LLM-Ensemble approach for automated subject indexing”. Preprint, sottomesso il 30 aprile 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.21589.
  25. Maltese, Diego. 1963. “Bibliografia, commercio librario e archivio nazionale del libro.” Bollettino d'informazioni AIB 3 (3): 84-9.
  26. Maltese, Diego. 1977. “Natura e formazione dell' archivio nazionale del libro.” Bollettino d'informazioni AIB 17( 4): 286-94.
  27. Maltese, Diego. 1979. “Natura e funzioni della Biblioteca nazionale centrale.” Il ponte 35 (4): 446-60.
  28. Mandillo, Anna Maria. 2000. “La nuova legge sul deposito legale: una riforma non solo per le biblioteche.” AIB notizie 14 (3): 4-7. https://www.aib.it/aib/editoria/n14/02-03mandillo.htm.
  29. Meschini, Federico. 2021. “Chi controlla il controllo bibliografico universale? Il sogno dei bibliotecari nell’ecosistema digitale.” AIB studi: rivista di biblioteconomia e scienze dell'informazione 61 (3): 623-27. https://doi.org/10.2426/aibstudi-13325.
  30. Mödden, Elisabeth. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and Bibliographic Control. DDC Short Numbers - Towards Machine-Based Classifying.” JLIS.it 13 (1): 256-64. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12775.
  31. Penzo Doria, Gianni. 2022. “Una nuova definizione di archivio.” JLIS.it 13 (2): 156-73. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-465
  32. Puglisi, Paola. 2007. “Deposito legale: la bicicletta nuova”. Bollettino AIB 47(1-2): 11-41. https://bollettino.aib.it/article/view/5203.
  33. Puglisi, Paola. 2020. “Deposito legale quattordici anni dopo: come, quando, quanto e perché.” AIB studi 60 (3): 591-614. https://aibstudi.aib.it/article/view/12477/11788.
  34. Roncaglia, Gino. 2023. L’architetto e l’oracolo. Bari: Laterza.
  35. Storey, Veda C., Wei Thoo Yue, J. Leon Zhao, e Roman Lukyanenko. 2025. “Generative artificial intelligence: evolving technology, growing societal impact, and opportunities for information systems research.” Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10581-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10581-7
  36. Storti, Chiara. 2023. “‘Resource not found’: cultural institutions, interinstitutional cooperation and collaborative projects for web heritage preservation.” JLIS.it 14 (2): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-533
  37. Storti, Chiara. 2024. “I requisiti per l’addestramento degli strumenti di Intelligenza Artificiale e il deposito legale delle risorse digitali: una riflessione sul contesto normativo italiano e il ruolo delle biblioteche.” Digitalia 19 (1): 23-35. https://doi.org/10.36181/digitalia-00092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36181/digitalia-00092
  38. Suominen, Osma, Juho Inkinen, e Mona Lehtinen. 2022. “Annif and Finto AI: Developing and implementing automated subject indexing.” JLIS.it 13 (1): 265–82. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12740.
  39. Suominen, Osma, Juho Inkinen, e Mona Lehtinen. “Annif at SemEval-2025 Task 5: traditional XMTC augmented by LLMs.” Preprint, sottomesso il 28 aprile 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.19675.
  40. Tammaro, Annamaria, e Emanuele Bellini. 2024. “Il ruolo della cibersecurity per le biblioteche digitali: sfide attuali e strategie di protezione.” Digitalia 19 (2): 100-14. https://digitalia.cultura.gov.it/article/view/3071/2151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36181/digitalia-00104
  41. Taylor, Jaime, Kelly Dagan, Margaret Youngberg, Therese Kaufman, e Johanna Radding. 2025. “A Survey of AI tools in library tech: accelerating into and unlocking streamlined enhanced convenient empowering game-changers.” Journal of electronic resources librarianship, May, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2025.2497738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1941126X.2025.2497738
  42. Traniello, Paolo. 1995. “La legislazione italiana sul deposito obbligatorio: l'eredità ottocentesca.” Bollettino AIB 35 (2): 221-31.
  43. Traniello, Paolo. 2000. “A proposito di archivio del libro: riflessioni su una sorprendente anticipazione di Domenico Comparetti.” Bollettino AIB 40 (2): 233-40.
  44. Vitiello, Giuseppe. 2007. “Come si consolida un’anomalia bibliotecaria: a proposito della nuova legge sul deposito legale in Italia”. Biblioteche oggi 25 (1): 9-21. https://www.bibliotecheoggi.it/media/download/get/28840afe-b5d9-45ff-97a6-09e942cc7ac8/original.
  45. Vitiello, Giuseppe. 2024. “Dalla Raccomandazione del Consiglio d’Europa (2023) al Rapporto OMC sulle biblioteche del Consiglio dell’Unione europea (2026).” Biblioteche oggi 42 (5): 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3302/0392-8586-202405-003-1.
  46. Zhao, Penghao, Hailin Zhang, Qinhan Yu, Zhengren Wang, Yunteng Geng, Fangcheng Fu, Ling Yang, Wentao Zhang, Jie Jiang, e Bin Cui. “Retrieval-augmented generation for ai-generated content: a survey.” Preprint, sottomesso il 29 febbraio 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.19473.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.