Vol. 17 No. 3 (2026)
Articles

Librarians’ Experiences and Expectations of the Narrative and Transmedia Shelf: Results from Two Focus Groups

Sara Dinotola
University of Turin
Bio
Roberto Testa
University of Turin
Bio

Published 2026-09-15

Keywords

  • Focus group,
  • Collection communication,
  • Libraries,
  • Transmedia and narrative shelf,
  • Transmediality,
  • Bibliographic mediation.
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Dinotola, Sara, and Roberto Testa. 2026. “Librarians’ Experiences and Expectations of the Narrative and Transmedia Shelf: Results from Two Focus Groups”. JLIS.It 17 (3):150-65. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-748.

Abstract

This paper presents the results of two focus groups involving librarians on the topic of library collection communication. Specifically, it discusses the “narrative and transmedia shelf”, a pre-prototype model designed to enhance both physical and digital resources, analyzing its effectiveness and sustainability within professional practice. The study aims, on the one hand, to value the experimental activity conducted by libraries that tested the model and, on the other, to explore the potential and critical issues hypothesized by participants interested in the project. The main thematic nodes emerged include the impact on the organization and usage of collections, the role of digital integration, and the expected benefits. Furthermore, the analysis highlights constraints related to professional skills and technological infrastructure. In conclusion, the paper discusses participative and collaborative approaches for integrating the model into library services.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Battaggia, Maddalena, e Fabio Mercanti. 2024. “Sapere e sentire digitale. Nuove prospettive di indagine per una visione più complessa e consapevole.” Biblioteche Oggi 42 (1): 14–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.3302/0392-8586-202401-014-1.
  2. Cooper, Alan, Robert Reimann, Dave Cronin, e Christopher Noessel. 2014. About Face: The Essentials of Interaction Design. Indianapolis: John Wiley.
  3. Cosgrove, Judith, e Romina Cachia. 2025. DigComp 3.0: European Digital Competence Framework. Fifth Edition. Lussemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC144121.
  4. Dempsey, Lorcan. 2012. “Thirteen Ways of Looking at Libraries, Discovery, and the Catalog: Scale, Workflow, Attention.” EDUCAUSE Review, 10 dicembre 2012. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2012/12/thirteen-ways-of-looking-at-libraries-discovery-and-the-catalog-scale-workflow-attention.
  5. Dinotola, Sara, e Roberto Testa. 2026. “Transmedia Library Shelf Experience: Innovative Research Approaches.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 58 (1): 332–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241310908. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241310908
  6. Dinotola, Sara, Roberto Testa, e Maurizio Vivarelli. 2024. “Verso lo scaffale narrativo e transmediale.” Biblioteche oggi 42 (5): 26–36. https://doi.org/10.3302/0392-8586-202405-026-1.
  7. Dinotola, Sara. 2020. “Biblioteche pubbliche e collezioni durante l’emergenza sanitaria: esperienze e (nuove) consapevolezze da cui ripartire.” Biblioteche oggi 38 (6-7): 4–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3302/0392-8586-202005-004-1.
  8. Faggiolani, Chiara. 2019. Conoscere gli utenti per comunicare la biblioteca: il potere delle parole per misurare l’impatto. Con contributi di Maddalena Battaglia, Egizia Cecchi, Flavia Massara, Roberta Montepeloso. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.
  9. Gwyer, Roisin. 2015. “Identifying and Exploring Future Trends Impacting on Academic Libraries: A Mixed Methodology Using Journal Content Analysis, Focus Groups, and Trend Reports.” New Review of Academic Librarianship 21 (3): 269–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1026452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2015.1026452
  10. Jenkins, Henry. 2014. Cultura convergente. Maggioli: Santarcangelo di Romagna.
  11. Jordan, Jessica, e Martina Haines. 2017. “Focus Groups: How Feedback from Employees Can Impact the Decision-Making Process.” Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice 5 (2): 117–26. https://doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2017.149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/palrap.2017.149
  12. MacMillan, Don, Susan McKee, e Shawna Sadler. 2007. “Getting everyone on the same page: A staff focus group study for library web site redesign.” Reference Services Review 35 (3): 425–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320710774292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320710774292
  13. Markey, Karen. 1983. Online Catalog Use: Results of Surveys and Focus Group Interviews in Several Libraries. Dublino: OCLC Online Computer Library Center.
  14. Martínez-Ávila D. 2017. “Reader-interest classifications.” Knowledge Organization 44 (3): 234–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2017-3-234
  15. Mellinger, Margaret, e May Chau. 2010. “Conducting focus groups with library staff: best practices and participant perceptions.” Library Management 31 (4–5): 267–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121011046335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121011046335
  16. Mikkonen, Anna, e Vakkari Pertti. 2012. “Readers’ search strategies for accessing books in public libraries.” In Proceedings of the 4th information interaction in context symposium, IIIX’12, a cura di Jaap Kamps, Wessel Kraaij e Norbert Fuhr, 214–23. Association for Computing Machinery. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2362724.2362760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2362724.2362760
  17. Morgan, David L. 2017. “Conclusions: A Call for Further Innovations in Focus Groups.” In A New Era in Focus Group Research: Challenges, Innovation and Practice, a cura di Rosaline S. Barbour e David L. Morgan, 411–20. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58614-8_19
  18. Ollé, Candela, e Ángel Borrego. 2010. “Librarians’ perceptions on the use of electronic resources at Catalan academic libraries: Results of a focus group.” New Library World 111 (1–2): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801011015685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074801011015685
  19. Ross, Catherine Sheldrick. 2001. “Making choices: What readers say about choosing books to read for pleasure.” The Acquisition Librarian 13 (25): 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J101v13n25_02. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J101v13n25_02
  20. Saunders, Benjamin, Julius Sim, Tom Kingstone, Shula Baker, Jackie Waterfield, Bernadette Bartlam, Heather Burroughs, e Clare Jinks. 2018. “Saturation in Qualitative Research: Exploring Its Conceptualization and Operationalization.” Quality & Quantity 52 (4): 1893–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
  21. Solidoro, Adriano, Ilenia Bua, e Camelia-Irina Caldarusa. 2020. “Quale futuro? Il fabbisogno formativo dei bibliotecari: Indagine sugli addetti delle biblioteche pubbliche italiane.” Biblioteche oggi 38 (2): 19–31.
  22. Spring, Hannah. 2014. “An Investigation into the Barriers to and Priorities for Research Engagement in Health Librarianship.” International Journal of Health Information Management Research 2 (1): 58–79.
  23. Vivarelli, Maurizio, e Sara Dinotola, a c. di. 2024. Sul confine. Le collezioni delle biblioteche tra gestione, produzione editoriale, esperienze di lettura. Milano: Ledizioni.
  24. Widdows, Richard, Tia A. Hensler, e Marlaya H. Wyncott. 1991. “The Focus Group Interview: A Method for Assessing Users’ Evaluation of Library Service.” College and Research Libraries 52 (4): 352–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_52_04_352
  25. Wildemuth, Barbara M., e Mary Jordan. 2017. “Focus Groups.” In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, a cura di Barbara M. Wildemuth, 325-42. Santa Barbara, California: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400613739