Vol. 13 No. 3 (2022): Modelling knowledge, archival and bibliographic standards in comparison. 1st JLIS.it Seminar - 19 May 2022

From the uniform title to the preferred title: the prominence of the cultural and linguistic context

Mauro Guerrini
University of Florence

Published 2022-09-15


  • Uniform title,
  • Cataloging,
  • Controlled access point,
  • Bibliographic Control

How to Cite

Guerrini, M. (2022). From the uniform title to the preferred title: the prominence of the cultural and linguistic context. JLIS.It, 13(3), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-474


By anchoring the title to a cultural context, it is possible that a universally valid title form (uniform title) does not exist or exist; the form used at the national or regional level is a form commonly used in that or those countries, that is, in a local or national context, not a global one. The concept of preferred title goes beyond, relativizing it, the cataloging model, considered an absolute time for every reality; it is acknowledged that what is valid for a specific cultural and linguistic context does not necessarily apply to the international context. The dissimilar historical behavior is exemplified by two examples: “One Thousand and One Nights”, and “The Chanson de Roland”.


Metrics Loading ...


  1. American Library Association, Library of Congress, Library Association, and Canadian Library Association. 1967. Anglo-American Cataloging Rules. North American text. Chicago: American Library Association.
  2. And then there where none. In: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_Then_There_Were_None>.
  3. Audiffredi, Giovanni Battista, Gioacchino Salvioni, and Giuseppe Salvioni. 1761. Bibliothecæ Casanatensis catalogus librorum Salvioni typis impressorum ... tomus primus (-quartus). Romæ: Excudebant Joachim, & Joannes Josephus Salvioni fratres, typographi pontificii vaticani in Archilyceo Romano.
  4. Buizza, Pino. 2002. “Dai Principi di Parigi a FRBR.” Bibliotime, 5(1). https://www.aib.it/aib/sezioni/emr/bibtime/num-v-1/buizza.htm.
  5. Commissione permanente per la revisione delle regole italiane di catalogazione e Istituto centrale per il catalogo unico delle biblioteche italiane e per le informazioni bibliografiche. 2009. Regole italiane di catalogazione: REICAT. Roma: ICCU.
  6. Hyde, Thomas. 1674. Catalogus impressorum librorum Bibliothecae Bodleianae in Academia Oxoniensi. Oxonia.
  7. IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional requirements for bibliographic records. Final report. München: Saur, 1998. Edizione italiana: IFLA. 2000. Requisiti funzionali per record bibliografici. Roma: ICCU. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110962451
  8. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. 2009. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles 2009. https://www.ifla.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf.
  9. IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2016. Statement of International Cataloguing Principles. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2016-en.pdf.
  10. IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2017. IFLA Library Reference Model. A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information. Edited by Pat Riva, Patrick Le Boeuf, and Maja Zumer. Den Haag: IFLA. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla_lrm_2017-03.pdf.
  11. Istituto Centrale per il Catalogo Unico delle Biblioteche Italiane e per le Informazioni Bibliografiche. 1979. Regole Italiane Di Catalogazione per Autori: RICA. Roma: ICCU.
  12. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA, American Library Association, Australian Committee on Cataloguing, British Library, Canadian Committee on Cataloguing, CILIP: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, and Library of Congress. 2015. Resource description and access: RDA. Chicago: American Library Association. Edizione italiana a cura dell’ICCU. Roma. http://www.iccu.sbn.it/opencms/export/sites/iccu/documenti/2015/RDA_Traduzione_ICCU_5_Novembre_REV.pdf.
  13. Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR, American Library Association, Australian Committee on Cataloguing, British library, Canadian committee on Cataloguing, Library Association, Library of Congress; a cura di Michael Gorman e Paul W. Winkler. 1988.
  14. Regole di catalogazione angloamericane. Edizione italiana a cura di Rossella Dini e Luigi Crocetti. 1997. Milano: Editrice Bibliografica.
  15. Smiraglia, Richard P. 2001. “Glossary.” In The nature of “A work”: implications for the organization of knowledge. Lanham, MD; London: Scarecrow.
  16. Verona, Eva. 1959. “Literary unit versus bibliographical unit.” Libri, 29(2):79-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1959.9.1-4.79